Montgomery Bank, N.A. v. Hoolihan et al
Plaintiff: |
Montgomery Bank, N.A. |
Defendant: |
Thomas P. Hoolihan, Jr., Kerrey R. Hoolihan, Riverbend Golf & Country Club, Inc., Vision One Management Group, Inc., Pike Creek Turf Farms, Inc., Lee County, State of Florida, Southern Gulf Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. and Riverbend Homeowners Association of Lee County, Inc. |
Case Number: |
2:2016cv00173 |
Filed: |
March 3, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Office: |
Ft. Myers Office |
County: |
Alachua |
Presiding Judge: |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Presiding Judge: |
Carol Mirando |
Nature of Suit: |
Foreclosure |
Cause of Action: |
12 U.S.C. ยง 191 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 7, 2017 |
Filing
105
ORDER denying 94 Montgomery Bank's Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of Order and Judgment of Dismissal. Montgomery Bank's Agreed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment of Dismissal 102 is DENIED. Montgomery Bank has until April 14, 2017 to serve process on FDOR. Failure to do so will result in FDOR's dismissal. Defendants Pike Creek and Southern Gulf are DISMISSED as a result of Montgomery Bank's failure to prosecute. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate them as parties in this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/7/2017. (LMF)
|
March 30, 2017 |
Filing
104
ORDER denying without prejudice 101 Plaintiff's Motion for Default by the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 3/30/2017. (HJ)
|
February 28, 2017 |
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part 89 Montgomery Bank's Notice of Settlement and Joint Motion to Retain Jurisdiction. All claims against Thomas P. Hoolihan, Jr., Kerrey R. Hoolihan, Riverbend Golf & Country Club, Inc. and Vision One Management Group , Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendants Thomas P. Hoolihan, Jr., Kerrey R. Hoolihan, Riverbend Golf & Country Club, Inc. and Vision One Mana gement Group, Inc. from this action. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement agreement. The claims asserted against all other Defendants remain active.. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/28/2017. (LMF)
|
October 6, 2016 |
Filing
73
ORDER granting 63 Defendants Riverbend Golf & Country Club, Inc. and Vision One Management Group, Inc.'s Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 62). Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 62) entered on August 31, 2016 is her eby vacated and set aside. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint (Doc. 63-1) as a separate entry in the CM/ECF system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/6/2016. (HJ)
|
October 3, 2016 |
Filing
69
ORDER denying as moot 55 Defendant Lee County's Motion to be Excused from All Pretrial Matters and Appearing at Trial; granting 68 Defendant Lee County's Unopposed Motion to be Excused from All Pretrial Matters and Appearing at Trial. Defendant Lee County is excused from appearing at all pretrial matters and trial. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/3/2016. (HJ)
|
August 30, 2016 |
Filing
60
ORDER denying as moot 51 Motion for Default; granting 57 Renewed Motion for Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/30/2016. (LS)
|
April 28, 2016 |
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Default by Clerk; granting in part 30 Motion to Dispense with In-Person CMR Meeting. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/28/2016. (ANW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?