Jablonski v. Mazer et al
| Edward J. Jablonski |
| Jason S. Mazer, Meghan C. Moore, R. Hugh Lumpkin, Brenton N. Ver Ploeg and Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A. |
| 2:2017cv00107 |
| February 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Dade |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Carol Mirando |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER dismissing case re 40 Amended Complaint. The Complaint 40 is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/19/2017. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying as moot 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing; granting in part and denying in part 38 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have up to and including July 12, 2017 to file an amended complaint pursuant to the Order (Doc. 24 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/12/2017. (HJ)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER. The Complaint 1 is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff Edward Jablonski has on or before April 3, 2017, to file an Amended Complaint that adequately pleads federal subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this Order will result in this case being dismissed. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/22/2017. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
