Comfort Line Products, Inc. v. Oceantis LLC et al
Plaintiff: Comfort Line Products, Inc.
Defendant: Oceantis LLC and Michael Shawn O'Brien
Case Number: 2:2017cv00198
Filed: April 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Presiding Judge: Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER re 54 Joint Stipulation to a Stay of the Proceeding and Request to Schedule Judicial Settlement Conference filed by Comfort Line Products, Inc. The Joint Stipulation to a Stay of the Proceedings and Request to Schedule Judicial Settlem ent Conference is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court stays this case pending resolution of the state court action. But it denies without prejudice the parties' request for a judicial settlement conference. All proceedings in this c ase are STAYED until the parties advise the Court that the state court case has been finished and the stay is due to be lifted or the case is due to be dismissed. The parties must notify the Court of such matters within seven days of the state court case ending. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report on the status of the state court case on or before February 27, 2019, and every ninety days after until that case concludes. The Clerk is DIRECTED to add a stay flag. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/29/2018. (LMF)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER denying without prejudice 46 Defendants, Oceantis, LLC's, and Michael Shawn O'Brien's, Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/25/2018. (DRS)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 10 Defendant Michael Shawn O'Brien's Motion to Dismiss.Plaintiff Comfort Line Products, Inc. may file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order on or before September 8, 2017. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/18/2017. (LMF)
June 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying as moot 16 Defendant, Oceantis, LLC's Motion to Quash Service of Process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/14/2017. (LS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Comfort Line Products, Inc. v. Oceantis LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Comfort Line Products, Inc.
Represented By: William E. Noonan
Represented By: Stuart M. Pepper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oceantis LLC
Represented By: Matthew Alan Linde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Shawn O'Brien
Represented By: Matthew Alan Linde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?