Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Plaintiff: Lisa Heather Martin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Case Number: 2:2017cv00496
Filed: August 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Charlotte
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Presiding Judge: Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER adopting 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 28 Unopposed MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2312(d) filed by Lisa Heather Martin.The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings in corporated herein. 2. Plaintiff Lisa Martin's Uncontested Petition for Equal Access to Justice Act Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. 28 ) is GRANTED. a. Attorney's fees in the total amount of $7,879.24 are awarded to Pla intiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and b. If the United States Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government accept Plaintiff's assignment of Equal Acc ess to Justice Act fees and pay fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plaintiff as to attorney's fees in the total amount of $7,879.24 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/2/2018. (LMF)
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER adopting 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Lisa Heather Martin. The Report and Recommendation 24 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for rehearing under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to: a. Permit questioning of the vocational expert regarding the source of the number of jobs in the national ec onomy a person with Plaintiff's limitations could perform; b. Conduct any further proceedings deemed appropriate. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/18/2018. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Heather Martin
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Represented By: Mark V. Zakhvatayev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?