Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Amanda Christine Clark
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2017cv00501
Filed:	September 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Ft. Myers Office
County:	Lee
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned Judge
Presiding Judge:	Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2019	Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees except as to the paralegal fees. Attorney fees in the amount of $8,510.88 are hereby awarded to plaintiff and may be paid directly to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed. The Clerk shall enter an amended judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/30/2019. (RKR)
March 8, 2019	Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 25 Report and Recommendations except for the harmless error finding at step 5 and the weight given to Dr. Kelly's "marked limitations maintaining attention" opinion; overruling objections in part and su staining in part; affirming in part and reversing in part the Decision of the Commissioner. The case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four as set forth in the Opinion and Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/8/2019. (RKR)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2019

Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees except as to the paralegal fees. Attorney fees in the amount of $8,510.88 are hereby awarded to plaintiff and may be paid directly to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed. The Clerk shall enter an amended judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/30/2019. (RKR)

March 8, 2019

Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 25 Report and Recommendations except for the harmless error finding at step 5 and the weight given to Dr. Kelly's "marked limitations maintaining attention" opinion; overruling objections in part and su staining in part; affirming in part and reversing in part the Decision of the Commissioner. The case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four as set forth in the Opinion and Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/8/2019. (RKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Christine Clark
Represented By:	Carol Ann Avard
Represented By:	Mark V. Zakhvatayev
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?