Arcadia Development LLC v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Arcadia Development LLC
Defendant: Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and Winn-Dixie Stores Leasing, LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv00552
Filed: October 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Duval
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Presiding Judge: Mac R. McCoy
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER re 43 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Winn-Dixie Stores Leasing, LLC, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. Plaintiff Arcadia Development LLC and Defendants Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and Winn-Dixie Stores Leasing, LLC's Stipulation of Dismis sal with Prejudice 43 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Court declines to retain jurisdiction over this case in order to enforce the parties' settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/27/2018. (LMF)
December 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is directed to file a Second Amended Complaint in order to correct the typographical error identified in its response on or before January 5, 2018; thereafter, Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days to file an Answer. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/28/2017. (LMF)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER re 23 Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/13/2017. (LMF)
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Arcadia Development LLC. The Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff Arcadia Development LLC has up to and including October 25, 2017, to file an amended complaint that properly alleges this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to do so will result in this case being dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/17/2017. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arcadia Development LLC v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arcadia Development LLC
Represented By: Mary Ruth Hawk
Represented By: David A. Kunselman
Represented By: Deborah J. Michelson
Represented By: Gregory Joseph Porges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Kim Bouchard-Chaimowiz
Represented By: Scott Jonathan Kennelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winn-Dixie Stores Leasing, LLC
Represented By: Kim Bouchard-Chaimowiz
Represented By: Scott Jonathan Kennelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?