Radzhabov v. United States of America, et al
| Firdavs Radzhabov |
| United Staes of America, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Marc J Moore, Juan Acosta, Jefferson B. Sessions, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Thomas D. Homan and David Hardin |
| 2:2018cv00119 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Carol Mirando |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER re: 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's April 23, 2018, Order. Should Petitioner wish to challenge his continued deten tion, he must file a new petition accompanied by the $5.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed as a pauper. Petitioner shall not use the instant case number on any new filing. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any pending motions, close this case, and enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk is further directed to provide Petitioner with a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus form and affidavit of indecency form with this Order. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/11/2018. (SLU)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
