Mraz v. I.C. Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Victor Mraz
Defendant: I.C. Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00254
Filed: April 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Presiding Judge: Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDERED: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 110) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (Doc. 96) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. 82) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Costs and Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 71) is GRANTED and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is AWARDED $72,651.50 in attorney's fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED $1,366.79 in costs. Plaintiff's fees and costs award BEARS post-judgment interest (under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)) from September 5, 2019, until paid. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant of $72,651.50 in attorney's fees and $1,366.79 in costs, both bearing post-judgment interest from September 5, 2019, until paid. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/8/2021. (AEH)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Article III Jurisdiction (Doc. 86) is DENIED. Defendant's Motion to Stay Case Pending Resolution of its Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Article III Jurisdiction (Doc. 87) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/4/2020. (AEH)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDERED: Defendant I.C. System Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint without Prejudice for Lack of Article III Jurisdiction (Doc. 57) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/2/2020. (AEH)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDERED: Plaintiff Victor Mraz's Motion for an Award of Costs and Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 41) is DENIED without prejudice. United States Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/30/2020. (AEH)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER re 36 Notice (Other) filed by Victor Mraz. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. The Clerk is directed to terminated all deadlines and pending motions. To enforce the accepted Offer of Judgment [36-1] the Court reserves jurisdiction to determine Plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and taxable costs, if necessary. Should the parties' fail to resolve those matters on their own, Plaintiff must FILE a motion for attorney's fees and costs on or before October 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/4/2019. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mraz v. I.C. Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Mraz
Represented By: Joseph C. LoTempio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.C. Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Dale Thomas Golden
Represented By: Charles James McHale, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?