Hammer v. Lee Memorial Health System et al
| Brianna Hammer |
| Lee Memorial Health System and Jeovanni Hechavarria |
| 2:2018cv00347 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| John E. Steele |
| Mac R. McCoy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Lee Memorial's Motion for Summary Judgment 70 is GRANTED; and 2. Defendant Jeovanni Hechavarria's Amended Motion to Stay 112 is GRANTED. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 03/02/2020. (LLM)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER denying 54 Motion for Leave of Court to Supplement and Amend Third Amended Complaint; overruling 59 Objections; adopting and incorporating 56 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/6/2019. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 17 motion to dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/19/2019. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/18/2018. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION and ORDER granting defendant's 6 motion to dismiss. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/3/2018. (CMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
