Thistle Communications, LLC v. E-1 Machine, LLC
Plaintiff: Thistle Communications, LLC
Defendant: E-1 Machine, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00679
Filed: October 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Mac R McCoy
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Set Aside Technical Default Motion to Extend time to Answer Complaint, and Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Clerk's Default by E-1 Machine, LLC. (Smoot, James)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 12/17/2018. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/3/2018. (RMT)
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by E-1 Machine, LLC.(Smoot, James)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for entry of clerk's default against E-1 Machine, LLC by Thistle Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Chase, Kenneth) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy.
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROOF of service by Thistle Communications, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Non-Service Willard, #2 Exhibit Non-Service Washington, #3 Exhibit Non-Service W. McNab, S. Deerfield, #4 Exhibit Secretary of State, #5 Exhibit Pak Mail)(Chase, Kenneth)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 10/31/2018. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/17/2018. (jmc)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/31/2018. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/17/2018. (jmc)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Unassigned Judge and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:18-cv-679-FtM-99MRM. (NAS)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/12/2018. (RMT)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to E-1 Machine, LLC. (RMT)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E-1 Machine, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14708736) filed by Thistle Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chase, Kenneth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thistle Communications, LLC v. E-1 Machine, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thistle Communications, LLC
Represented By: Kenneth Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E-1 Machine, LLC
Represented By: James Thomas Smoot, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?