Jane Doe v. Jenner
| Jane Doe |
| Travis John Jenner |
| 2:2018cv00683 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Mac R McCoy |
| John E Steele |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of counsel re #10 Related case order and track 2 notice service of Order, Notice & attachments to Defendant by Douglas R. Beam on behalf of Jane Doe (Beam, Douglas) |
| ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney James R. Marsh appearing on behalf of Jane Doe (Filing fee $150 receipt number FtM013165.). (drn) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #11 Interested persons order by Jane Doe. (Beam, Douglas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jane Doe. Related case(s): yes (Beam, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 11/5/2018. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/22/2018. (jmc) |
Filing 10
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/5/2018. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/22/2018. (jmc)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Verified Motion for Admission to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Unless already completed, within 14 days, Attorney James R. Marsh shall send the required fee to the Clerk's Office. Unless already completed, within 14 days, Counsel shall complete and submit the E-Filer Registration Form for CM/ECF. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 10/17/2018. (brh)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Travis John Jenner. (drn) |
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/16/2018. (drn) |
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:18-cv-683-FtM-29MRM. (NAS) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in support re 3 Exparte motion for miscellaneous relief to Proceed by Pseudonym filed by Jane Doe. (Beam, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for James R. Marsh to appear pro hac vice by Jane Doe. (Beam, Douglas) Modified on 10/16/2018 to edit docket text (drn). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Travis John Jenner with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14716181) filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Beam, Douglas) Modified on 10/16/2018 to edit docket text (drn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jane Doe v. Jenner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jane Doe | |
| Represented By: | Douglas R. Beam |
| Represented By: | James R. Marsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Travis John Jenner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
