Ott v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michael Otto and Michael Ott |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2018cv00791 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carol Mirando |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases is NOT per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Michael Ott. Related case(s): no (Kushner, Jonas) |
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/4/2018. (drn) |
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER in re: courtesy paper copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/9/14. (drn)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (drn)
|
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 12/17/2018. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/3/2018. (WRW) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RMT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Filing fee $400, receipt number FtM013229 filed by Michael Otto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RMT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
