Siebert v. Novak Environmental Services, LLC.
Plaintiff: Bill Siebert
Defendant: Novak Environmental Services, LLC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00796
Filed: December 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Mac R McCoy
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2019 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Novak Environmental Services, LLC.. (Chotiner, Adam)
January 22, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related cases order and Track 2 Notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Novak Environmental Services, LLC.. Related case(s): no (Chotiner, Adam) Modified on 1/22/2019 as to docket text.(MLS).
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The response shall be filed no later than February 11, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 1/22/2019. (ATC)
January 22, 2019 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Novak Environmental Services, LLC.. (Chotiner, Adam)
January 22, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam S. Chotiner on behalf of Novak Environmental Services, LLC. (Chotiner, Adam)
December 21, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Bill Siebert. (Gunter, Jason)
December 21, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Bill Siebert. Related case(s): no (Gunter, Jason)
December 10, 2018 Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 12/24/2018. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/10/2018. (WRW)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 12/24/2018. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/10/2018. (WRW)
December 6, 2018 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/6/2018. (MLS)
December 5, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Novak Environmental Services, LLC. (RMT)
December 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Novak Environmental Services, LLC. with Jury Demand Filing fee $400, receipt number FtM013251 filed by Bill Siebert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RMT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siebert v. Novak Environmental Services, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bill Siebert
Represented By: Victor Bermudez
Represented By: Jason L. Gunter
Represented By: Conor Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novak Environmental Services, LLC.
Represented By: Adam S. Chotiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?