St Onge v. Commissioner of Social Security
Michael Norman St Onge |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
2:2019cv00084 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 2/28/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/14/2019. (WRW) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier on 2/12/2019. (APH) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/12/2019. (drn) |
Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (drn) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs (Short Form) by Michael Norman St Onge. (RMT) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of indigency by Michael Norman St Onge. (RMT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Michael Norman St Onge. (RMT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Unassigned Magistrate. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Michael Norman St Onge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RMT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.