Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Kuntz
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company, as successor in interest to Western Heritage Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant: Charles Dylan Kuntz
Case Number: 2:2019cv00113
Filed: February 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Mac R McCoy
Referring Judge: John E Steele
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2019 Filing 9 WAIVER of service returned executed on 04/01/2019 by Scottsdale Insurance Company as to Charles Dylan Kuntz. (McLean, Patricia)
March 15, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Related case(s): y (McLean, Patricia)
March 15, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insuarnce Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company.. (McLean, Patricia)
March 1, 2019 Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 3/15/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/1/2019. (WRW)
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 3/15/2019. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/1/2019. (WRW)
February 26, 2019 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/26/2019. (drn)
February 26, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Charles Dylan Kuntz. (drn)
February 25, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:19-cv-113-FtM-29MRM. (SJB)
February 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Charles Dylan Kuntz (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15168475) filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons)(McLean, Patricia) Modified on 2/26/2019 to edit docket text (drn).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Kuntz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company, as successor in interest to Western Heritage Insurance Company
Represented By: Patricia A. McLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Represented By: Patricia A. McLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Dylan Kuntz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?