Fitzsimmons v. Biomet Orthopedics et al
Case Number: 2:2019cv00182
Filed: November 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is GRANTED as to (1) the manufacturing defect and failure to warn portions of the strict liability claim in Count One, (2) the breach of implied warranties claim in Count Three, (3) the breach of express warranty claim in Count Four, and (4) the standalone failure to warn claim in Count Five. The motion is otherwise DENIED. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/21/2021. (FWH)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 124 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Mari Truman and Memorandum in Support and 125 Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of George S. Kantor, M.D. and Memorandum in Support. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/18/2020. (FWH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitzsimmons v. Biomet Orthopedics et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?