Smith v. Lendus, LLC
| Brandon Smith |
| Lendus, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00294 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Lendus, LLC. (Neilsen, Eric) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/18/2019 at 02:15 PM in Ft. Myers Courtroom 6 B before Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier. Any motion or other filing pertaining to the Preliminary Pretrial Conference must be filed three (3) business days in advance of the hearing to ensure consideration. (MLJ) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Lendus, LLC.(Neilsen, Eric) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement, #6 Interested persons order by Brandon Smith. (Yormak, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Brandon Smith. (Yormak, Benjamin) Modified on 5/13/2019. Incorrect PDF attachment - counsel to resubmit (drn). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Brandon Smith. Related case(s): No. (Yormak, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 5/24/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/10/2019. (jmc) |
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND TRACK 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 5/24/2019. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/10/2019. (jmc)
|
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/3/2019. (SPB) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Lendus, LLC. (RMT) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Unassigned Judge and Magistrate Judge Unassigned Magistrate. New case number: 2:19-cv-294-FtM-99UAM. (NAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lendus, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15423807) filed by Brandon Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Yormak, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Lendus, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lendus, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Eric William Neilsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandon Smith | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin H. Yormak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
