Evans v. Warden, Charlotte CI et al
| Michael Evans |
| J. Dawson, Inspector, Charlotte CI, Warden, Charlotte CI and K. Williams |
| Derek Snider |
| 2:2019cv00527 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File and Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file a Rule 12(f)(2) motion to Defendant William's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, if appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 9/18/2019. (SLU)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to move to strike by Michael Evans. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply is granted, to the extent that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint within 30 days of the date on this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/16/2019. (SLU)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to quash Service by Derek Snider. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Affidavit)(Gregg, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Michael Evans. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by K. Williams.(Gregg, Robert) Modified on 8/15/2019 to edit docket text (SLU). |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Complaint by K. Williams. (Gregg, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by K. Williams. Related case(s): No (Gregg, Robert) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 8/13/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/30/2019. (SLU) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that the case has been removed to this division (signed by deputy clerk). (SLU) |
| Filing 3 VERIFIED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against J. Dawson, Inspector, Charlotte CI, Warden, Charlotte CI, K. Williams with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 113A-15740647 filed by Michael Evans. Filed in State Court on 6/28/19.(SLU) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:19-cv-527-FtM-38NPM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Florida, case number 082019CA000702XXXXXX filed in State Court on June 28, 2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15740647 filed by K. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 State Court Other Documents Other Filings, #4 State Court Docket Sheet (State))(Gregg, Robert) Modified on 7/29/2019 to edit filers and docket text (SLU). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
