Soule et al v. Monsanto Company
Bryan Soule and Peggy Sue Soule |
Monsanto Company |
2:2019cv00656 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Northern District of California as case 3:19-cv-06437, filed on 10/16/19. (laf) |
Filing 6 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Northern District of California MDL case number: 2741 (laf) |
Filing 5 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along case for MDL Case Number 2741, Information emailed to MDL Panel on 9/9/19, including cover letter, copy of complaint, and docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Docket Sheet) (MLS) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/9/2019. (MLS) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (MLS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:19-cv-656-FtM-60NPM. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15891011) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Kagan, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.