Elliott v. Commissioner of Social Security
Debra Ann Elliott |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
2:2019cv00713 |
September 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 US Marshal 285 form for Service of Summons on US Attorney, served 10/21/19. (MLS) |
|
Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (drn) |
|
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Debra Ann Elliott. Related case(s): No (Harris, Suzanne) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/1/2019. (drn) |
|
|
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:19-cv-713-FtM-60NPM. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (SJB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Debra Ann Elliott. (Harris, Suzanne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Debra Ann Elliott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk)(Harris, Suzanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.