Richman v. United States of America
Petitioner: Ulysses Richman
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv00732
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Referring Judge: John E Steele
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 the Government's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Government may file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody #1 on or before January 15, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/10/2019. (HAP)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 2:13-cr-127-FtM-29NPM by United States of America. (Michelland, Jeffrey) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ulysses Richman. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to respond why the petition should not be granted. Petitioner has 21 days to reply to the petition response. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition on the government. Response to petition due by 12/17/2019. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/17/2019. (RKR)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by United States of America. Related case(s): yes (Michelland, Jeffrey)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/16/2019. (SLU)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/30/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/16/2019. (SLU)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in support re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Ulysses Richman. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Criminal Case No. 2:13-cr-127-FtM-29NPM filed by Ulysses Richman. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richman v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Michael Bagge-Hernandez
Represented By: Jeffrey Michelland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ulysses Richman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?