Bond et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
| Ann Bond and Robert Bond |
| National Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv00059 |
| January 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 0635 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-59-FtM-38NPM. (SJB) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by National Specialty Insurance Company (Filed in State Court on 12/2/2019).(MLJ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against National Specialty Insurance Company with Jury Demand filed by Robert Bond, Ann Bond (Filed in State Court on 11/11/2019). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(MLJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lee County Circuit Court, case number 19-CA-007524 filed in State Court on November 11, 2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16403663 filed by National Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Other Documents, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Henry, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
