Healy v. Davidovich et al
| Mark Healy |
| Avry Davidovich, Maxwell Davidovich and Alexander Davidovich |
| Town Star Holdings, LLC |
| 2:2020cv00107 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED: Defendants' Motion to Withdraw Reference (Doc. #2) is DENIED without prejudice. The Court GRANTS leave for Defendants to file another motion to withdraw reference near the time of trial. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/6/2020. (AEH)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Alexander Davidovich, Avry Davidovich, Maxwell Davidovich. Related case(s): yes (Corso, Michael) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 3/13/2020. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/28/2020. (jmc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Withdraw reference and incorporated memorandum of law by Avry Davidovich. (RMT) |
| Filing 1 TRANSMITTAL of bankruptcy record (reference withdrawn) filed by Avry Davidovich.(RMT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
