Brooks v. Sawyer et al
| Rufus J. Brooks, Jr. |
| E. Salema, Donald Sawyer and JP Carner |
| 2:2020cv00269 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SLU) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice under M.D. Fla. R. 1.03(e) re #1 Complaint. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, Plaintiff may initiate a new action by filing a new complaint accompanied by the requisite filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis if he wishes to prosecute his claim. Plaintiff should not use this case number for his new case. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions or deadlines, enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/20/2020. (SLU)
|
| Filing 3 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/16/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/16/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Carner, E. Salema, Donald Sawyer with Jury Demand filed by Rufus J. Brooks, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope) (no fee/ifp; no service copies)(SLU) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
