Houtsma v. Sloan et al
John Glenn Houtsma |
FNU Sawyer, Neville Graham, Rick Sloan and FNU Riddle |
2:2020cv00350 |
May 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Mac R McCoy |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by John Glenn Houtsma. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) STRICKEN and returned pursuant to DOC #8 Modified on 7/9/2020 (RMT). |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by John Glenn Houtsma. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. STRICKEN and Returned pursuant to Doc #8 Modified on 7/9/2020 (RMT). |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SLU) |
|
Filing 3 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/14/2020. (SLU) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 5/14/2020. (SLU) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (submitted and filed as a double-sided pleading) against Neville Graham, FNU Riddle, FNU Sawyer, Rick Sloan with Jury Demand filed by John Glenn Houtsma. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (no fee/ifp; no service copies)(SLU) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.