Gaydos et al v. Lexington Insurance Company
| Patricia Gaydos and Robert Gaydos |
| Lexington Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv00373 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Mac R McCoy |
| John E Steele |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT re #13 Order Requiring Defendant to Supplement the Notice of Removal to Demonstrate Subject-Matter Jurisdiction by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Travis, Nicholas) |
Filing 14
ORDER to strike re: #12 Case Management Report. The parties shall file an amended case management report on the new form along with a Pretrial & Discovery Plan within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/16/2020. (RKR)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER directing defendant to supplement the Notice of Removal within 7 days of this Order demonstrating subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/16/2020. (RKR)
|
| Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Terrell, Robert) Modified on 7/17/2020. Stricken per Order #14 (drn). |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Patricia Gaydos, Robert Gaydos. (Terrell, Robert) |
| Filing 10 Defendant, Lexington Insurance Company's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kevlin, Anne) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's Motion to Meet and Confer by Telephone to Prepare Case Management Report. The parties may confer telephonically for the purpose of preparing their Case Management Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 6/9/2020. (JTB)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Robert Terrell to appear telephonically by Patricia Gaydos. (Terrell, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. |
| Filing 7 TRACK TWO ORDER AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ORDER Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/2/2020. (WRW) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Default. Although the motion was filed in the state court proceedings before this case was removed to federal court, this Court construes the motion to be brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). Defendant must respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #4) no later than 6/10/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 5/27/2020. (JTB)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Set Aside Clerk Default by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(drn) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Lexington Insurance Company with Jury Demand filed in State Court by Patricia Gaydos, Robert Gaydos.(drn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Lexington Insurance Company of Filing Defendant's Rule 7.1 Statement (Kevlin, Anne) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:20-cv-373-FtM-29MRM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lee County Circuit Court, case number 2020-CA-001964 filed in State Court on 03/26/2020. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16841503 filed by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kevlin, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
