Harmon v. Toyota North America Inc. et al
| David Lee Harmon |
| Venice Toyota and Toyota North America Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00409 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Mac R McCoy |
| John E Steele |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SLU) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE dismissing #1 Complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk shall enter judgment and close this file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/8/2020. (RKR)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION (pages 3-4 not received) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by David Lee Harmon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to view short application by David Lee Harmon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) |
| Filing 3 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/10/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER FOR INCARCERATED PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/10/2020. (SLU) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Toyota North America Inc., Venice Toyota with Jury Demand filed by David Lee Harmon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SLU) (no fee/ifp; no service copies) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
