Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Beverly F. Woodward |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2020cv00417 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TRACK ONE RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/17/2020. (jmc)
|
|
Filing 6
Case Reassigned to John L. Badalamenti. New case number: 2:20-cv-417-FtM-66NPM. Judge Thomas P. Barber no longer assigned to the case. (MLJ)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of pendency of related cases is NOT per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Beverly F. Woodward. Related case(s): no (Kushner, Jonas)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER in re: courtesy paper copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 7/19/2019. (MLJ)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (MLJ)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RMT)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Filing fee $400, receipt number FtM014639 filed by Beverly F. Woodward. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RMT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
