Lindle v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Clarence Lindle |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2020cv00462 |
| June 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Mac R McCoy |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, which the Court construes as a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It appears the affidavit submitted relates to another case and that counsel transposed the case numbers when filing the affidavit in this case. In any event, the affidavit is not signed by the named Plaintiff in this case and cannot be considered to determine Plaintiff's indigency. Therefore, no later than 7/7/2020, Plaintiff must re-file his Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with the appropriate affidavit signed by Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 6/30/2020. (JTB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Clarence Lindle. (RMT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy.
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Clarence Lindle. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) #2 Main Document) #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (RMT).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
