Thornberry v. U.S. Water Services Corporation
Plaintiff: Christopher Thornberry
Defendant: U.S. Water Services Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv00678
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2020 Filing 12 JUDGMENT ( Signed by Deputy Clerk) (MLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED: The above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all pending deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/14/2020. (AEH)
October 9, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Christopher Thornberry. (Rothman, Bradley)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Respond, or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant will have until October 16, 2020 to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 10/2/2020. (SM)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. See order for Court deadlines and directives. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/29/2020. (AEH)
September 25, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by U.S. Water Services Corporation. (Morales, Suhaill) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
September 17, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Track Two Notice and Corporate Disclosure Order by Christopher Thornberry. (Rothman, Bradley) Modified on 9/17/2020 to amend docket text (MLS).
September 17, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Track Two Notice and Corporate Disclosure Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Christopher Thornberry. Related case(s): No (Rothman, Bradley) Modified on 9/17/2020 to amend docket text (MLS).
September 3, 2020 Filing 4 TRACK TWO NOTICE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/3/2020. (jmc)
September 1, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to U.S. Water Services Corporation. (MLS)
September 1, 2020 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-678-FtM-38NPM. (SJB)
August 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Water Services Corporation with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17252139) filed by Christopher Thornberry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Rothman, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornberry v. U.S. Water Services Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Thornberry
Represented By: Bradley Paul Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Water Services Corporation
Represented By: Suhaill Machado Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?