Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Verlon Craig Davis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2020cv00781
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Verlon Craig Davis as to U.S. Attorney General, served 10/14/20 (Harris, Suzanne) Modified on 10/15/2020 to amend docket text (MLS).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Verlon Craig Davis as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration on October 13, 2020 (Harris, Suzanne) Modified on 10/15/2020 to amend docket text(MLS).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Verlon Craig Davis as to United States Attorney on October 13, 2020(Harris, Suzanne) Modified on 10/15/2020 to amend docket text (MLS).
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #6 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Verlon Craig Davis. Related case(s): NO (Harris, Suzanne)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/7/2020. (jmc)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER in re: courtesy paper copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 7/19/19. (drn)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (drn)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Main Document, #2 Main Document)(drn)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-781-FtM-38NPM. (SJB)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17395562) filed by Verlon Craig Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Harris, Suzanne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verlon Craig Davis
Represented By: Suzanne Lynn Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?