Drons v. Monsanto Company
| Robert Drons |
| Monsanto Company |
| 2:2020cv00854 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the California Northern District as case 3:20-cv-08167, filed on 11/19/2020. (LMF) |
| Filing 9 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel CTO-243 order transferring case to: Northern District of California. MDL case number: 2741 (laf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/2021 at 10:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. Parties shall file a Case Management Report and Pretrial & Discovery Plan by 1/21/2021. All parties shall appear telephonically. The toll-free teleconference number is 1-877-873-8018. The access code is 5997085. You will then be prompted to enter a participant security code: 20854. All parties are encouraged to utilize a landline or similarly stable connection free of ambient interference to avoid having any portion of the conference conducted without them. (WRW) |
| Filing 7 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along case for MDL. Information emailed to MDL Panel on 11/3/20, including cover letter, docket sheet, notice of removal and State Court complaint. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Notice of Removal, #3 State Court COMPLAINT) (drn) |
| Filing 6 TRACK TWO NOTICE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 11/2/2020. (jmc) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand filed by Robert Drons.(RMT) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company. (Upshaw, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Monsanto Company.(Upshaw, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-854-FtM-66NPM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lee County, case number 20CA5203 filed in State Court on 08/07/2020. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-17482481 filed by Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Upshaw, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Drons v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Drons | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Bernheim |
| Represented By: | Ronald D. Rodman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Nolan Upshaw |
| Represented By: | Melissa Raspall Alvarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
