Tibbetts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Rhonda Lynn Tibbetts |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
2:2020cv00872 |
November 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Mac R McCoy |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Track One and Related Case Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Rhonda Lynn Tibbetts. Related case(s): No (Berke, Bill) |
Filing 5 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 11/5/2020. (jmc) |
Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (drn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Main Document, #2 Main Document)(drn) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:20-cv-872-FtM-38MRM. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17500949) filed by Rhonda Lynn Tibbetts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons OGC, #3 Proposed Summons USAG, #4 Proposed Summons USAO)(Berke, Bill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.