Guzman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
| Faber Guzman |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 2:2020cv00881 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| John E Steele |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay to the extent that the case is administratively dismissed for a period of 60 days. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines in light of the administrative closure. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/8/2020. (RKR)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending Settlement with Equifax Information Services, LLC by Faber Guzman. (Steinmetz, Yosef) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. By January 7, 2021, Equifax Information Services, LLC will respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/4/2020. (brh)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC.. (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Meier, Alexander) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 11/17/2020 by Faber Guzman as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Steinmetz, Yosef) |
| Filing 4 TRACK TWO AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 11/5/2020. (jmc) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (drn) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-881-FtM-29NPM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17516546) filed by Faber Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Steinmetz, Yosef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guzman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Charles Meier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Faber Guzman | |
| Represented By: | Yosef Steinmetz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
