Santiago v. Gahrmann et al
| Benito Santiago |
| Jane Doe, FNU Gahrmann, FNU Martin, FNU Morales, FNU Ostromecki, FNU Jean-Pierre and FNU Mena |
| 2:2020cv01009 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER striking #9 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to track one and related case order; striking #10 Motion to order the Florida Department of Corrections to complete and sign application to proceed in forma pauperis form. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions and return the documents to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 1/27/2021. (LYB)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to order the Florida Department of Corrections to complete and sign application to proceed in forma pauperis form by Benito Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 A, #2 Exhibit 1 B, #3 Mailing Envelope)(RMT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. STRICKEN pursuant to #11 Order Modified on 1/27/2021 (LYB). |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to track one and related case order by Benito Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RMT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. STRICKEN pursuant to #11 Order Modified on 1/27/2021 (LYB). |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT ( Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RMT) |
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Benito Santiago's Motion to Amend 1983 Complaint and Affidavit of Indigency Form (Doc. #3) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to docket the Complaint (Doc. #1) and the Application (Doc. #2) as amended filings in Case No. 2:20-cv-938-FtM-38MRM. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close this case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/5/2021. (SLU)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING PRISONER CONSENT FORM AND FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE. Plaintiff, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, shall either file a fully completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate (if Plaintiff desires to proceed as a pauper) or pay the $402.00 filing fee (if Plaintiff does not desire to proceed as a pauper). Failure to do so or to explain noncompliance within the allotted time will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/4/2021. (SLU)
|
| Filing 5 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/30/2020. (LYB) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for Incarcerated Pro Se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/30/2020. (LYB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Benito Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LYB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Benito Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LYB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, FNU Gahrmann, FNU Jean-Pierre, FNU Martin, FNU Mena, FNU Morales, FNU Ostromecki filed by Benito Santiago. (7 service copies provided / No fee paid - IFP filed) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LYB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
