Damian v. Courtright et al
| Melanie E. Damian, as Receiver and Melanie E. Damian as Receiver of Today's Growth Consultant, Inc. doing business as The Income Store |
| Courtright Consulting, Inc. and William Courtright |
| 2:2020cv01012 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to William Courtright, Courtright Consulting, Inc. (RMT) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Melanie E. Damian. (Murena, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Melanie E. Damian. (Murena, Kenneth) |
Filing 4
CIVIL ACTION ORDER. See order for Court deadlines and directives. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell, Judge John Badalamenti, Judge John E. Steele, Judge Mac R. McCoy and Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 2/3/2021.(AEH)
|
| Filing 3 TRACK TWO NOTICE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ORDER Signed by All Divisional Judges on 1/4/2021. (WRW) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:20-cv-1012-FTM-38NPM. (LRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-17715509) filed by Melanie E. Damian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Murena, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
