Finley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Gregory Paul Finley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2021cv00010 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PROOF of service by Gregory Paul Finley (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 7 PROOF of service by Gregory Paul Finley (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service by Gregory Paul Finley (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Gregory Paul Finley. Related case(s): no (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 4 TRACK ONE AND RELATED CASE ORDER Signed by All Divisional Judges on 1/14/2021. (WRW) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RMT) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:21-cv-0010-FtM-66NPM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-17730699) filed by Gregory Paul Finley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Avard, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
