White et al v. Brodeur
| Dwayne White and Lavern White |
| Thomas Brodeur |
| 2:2021cv00139 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. The Whites' request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot in light of this remand. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and close the file. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 4/5/2021. (NM)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Dwayne White, Lavern White. (RMT) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL OF ACTION filed by Lavern White, Dwayne White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit A-B, #3 Exhibit C-D)(RMT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
