Schwartz v. ADP, LLC. et al
| David Schwartz |
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc., ADP, LLC. and ADP, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00283 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Mac R McCoy |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Motion for More Definite Statement and Motion for Judicial Notice by ADP, Inc., Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Deposition Transcript, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Notice of Appeal)(Hopkins, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by David Schwartz. Related case(s): Yes (Goodman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11) because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. #16). See Malowney v. Fed. Collection Deposit Grp., 193 F.3d 1342, 1345 n.1 (11th Cir. 1999).Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/13/2021. (TWO)
|
|
Filing 16
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by David Schwartz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V)(Goodman, Robert) Modified double text on 5/13/2021 (LYB).
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER GOVERNING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 5/10/2021. (jmc)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GOVERNING TELEPHONIC PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 5/10/2021. (jmc)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of hearing: Telephonic Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/22/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. DIAL IN INSTRUCTIONS: TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-888-273-3658, ACCESS CODE: 8335587. Dial in at least 5 minutes before hearing time. Landline preferred. Do not use the speaker phone feature during the call.'Notwithstanding any prior Order of the Court, the parties must jointly file a Case Management Report on the approved form no later than 6/7/2021. To the extent Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) so requires, the Court finds good cause to extend the time period for entering the Case Management and Scheduling Order until after the Case Management Report is filed and the Preliminary Pretrial Conference is held.(jmc)
|
|
Filing 12
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by ADP, LLC., Automatic Data Processing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent ADP, Inc. for ADP, LLC., Automatic Data Processing, Inc... (Hopkins, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, and MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Transcript, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Appeal)(Hopkins, Christopher) Modified on 4/29/2021 added link to Complaint and cleaned up double exhibit text (LYB).
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Civil Action Order by David Schwartz. (Goodman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN of service executed on 04/07/2021 by David Schwartz as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Goodman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN of service executed on 04/07/2021 by David Schwartz as to ADP, LLC.. (Goodman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by David Schwartz Filing Return of Service on Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service ADP, LLC, #2 Exhibit Return of Service Automatic Data Processing Inc.)(Goodman, Robert)
|
|
Filing 6
CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/5/2021. (LYB)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LYB)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS issued as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (LYB)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS issued as to ADP, LLC. (LYB)
|
|
Filing 2
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:21-cv-0283-SPC-MRM. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-18078703) filed by David Schwartz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Exhibit K, #15 Exhibit L, #16 Exhibit M, #17 Exhibit N, #18 Exhibit O, #19 Exhibit P, #20 Exhibit Q, #21 Exhibit R, #22 Exhibit S, #23 Exhibit T, #24 Exhibit U, #25 Exhibit V)(Goodman, Robert)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
