Smith v. Masters
| Brent Eugene Smith |
| Melinda Masters |
| 2:2021cv00739 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denying as moot #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 11/16/2021. (KLM)
|
| Filing 11 STANDING ORDER directing the Clerk to immediately email the state or federal official where this person is confined, a copy of this Order and the Notice at Doc. 10 for whatever prompt action may be appropriate. Additionally, the Clerk is directed to confirm the official received the Court's email and do an entry on the docket stating the name of the official who received the Court's notice and when. Signed by all Ft. Myers Judges on 11/2/2021.(KLM) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brent Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jmc) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (jmc) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: All claims against Defendant Masters are dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. With no remaining defendants, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions, close this file, and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 10/29/2021. (KLM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically 5 Year Litigation Hold by Brent Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(jmc) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brent Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jmc) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/7/2021. (JK) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/7/2021. (JK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brent Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of indigency by Brent Eugene Smith. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Melinda Masters filed by Brent Eugene Smith. No IFP - Affidavit of Indigency filed. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Masters | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brent Eugene Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Melinda Masters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
