E-Z Dock, Inc. v. Snap Dock, LLC
E-Z Dock, Inc. |
Snap Dock, LLC |
2:2021cv00805 |
October 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Mac R McCoy |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Southern District of Indiana as case 1:21-cv-2761, filed on 11/2/2021. (LMF) |
Filing 8 CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to the District of Southern District of Indiana (LMF) |
Filing 7 ORDERED: Defendants Snap Dock, LLC and Golden Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) is DENIED in part. EZ Dock's patent-infringement claim (Count II) against Snap Dock is severed from this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to open a new case with EZ Dock as the Plaintiff and Snap Dock as the Defendant (Golden will not be a party) and docket the following filings in the new case: a.EZ Dock's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 26)b.Snap Dock's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 28)c.EZ Dock's Response (Doc. 35)d.Snap Dock's Reply (Doc. 40)e.The Court's October 12, 2021 Order (Doc. 41)f.The parties' Joint Report (Doc. 42)g. This Order. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to transfer the new case to the Indianapolis Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, then close the new case. Defendants must answer the First Amended Complaint on or before November 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/28/2021. (Originally filed as Docket Number 43, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 10/28/2021.)(SPB) |
Filing 6 JOINT STATUS report, pursuant to #5 Order by Snap Dock, LLC, E-Z Dock, Inc. (SPB) (Originally filed as Docket Number 42, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 10/22/2021.) |
Filing 5 ORDERED: Defendants Snap Dock, LLC and Golden Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. #2) is DENIED in part. The Court takes Defendants' arguments on Count 2 under advisement. The parties shall confer and, within 14 days of the date of this Order, file a joint report (a) identifying the district where EZ Dock's patent infringement claim against Snap Dock should be transferred and (b) stating whether EZ Dock's patent infringement claim against Golden can also be transferred to that district. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/09/2021. (SPB) (Originally filed as Docket Number 41, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 10/9/2021.) |
Filing 4 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Snap Dock, LLC. (SPB) (Originally filed as Docket Number 40, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 9/27/2021.) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by E-Z Dock, Inc. (SPB) (Originally filed as Docket Number 35, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 9/14/2021.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Snap Dock, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Blake Elder)(SPB)(Originally filed as Docket Number 28, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 8/24/2021.) |
Filing 1 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Snap Dock, LLC with Jury Demand filed by E-Z Dock, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (SPB) (Originally filed as Docket Number 26, in case number 2:21-cv-00450-SPC-NPM on 8/10/2021.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.