Shaw v. Scerbo et al
| William S. Shaw |
| cj scerbo, James Iverson, jim fitzgerald, gilberto freitas, C.J. Scerbo, Healthpark Hospital, Miguel Olivencia and Brian Hornsby |
| 2:2022cv00105 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| John E Steele |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William S. Shaw. (jmc) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (jmc).
|
|
Filing 14
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William S. Shaw. Related document: #3 Complaint filed by William S. Shaw.(jmc)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Related Action by C.J. Scerbo (Haskins, Mark) Modified on 4/5/2022 to correct docket text. Wrong event used. (jmc).
|
|
Filing 12
UNILATERAL CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Haskins, Mark) Modified on 4/5/2022 (jmc).
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE if Filing Defendant's Discovery Plan by C.J. Scerbo (Haskins, Mark) Modified on 4/5/2022 *old form* (jmc).
|
|
Filing 10
UNILATERAL CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Haskins, Mark) Modified on 4/5/2022 (jmc) *old form*.
|
|
Filing 9
OPINION and ORDER granting Defendants' #6 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. See ORDER for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/25/2022. (TLP)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING HEARING (AS TO TIME ONLY): The Preliminary Pretrial Conference previously scheduled for 4/26/2022 at 10:00 AM is rescheduled to 4/26/2022 at 11:00 AM in Ft. Myers Courtroom 4 E before Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. Parties shall file a Case Management Report by 4/11/2022.(WRW)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/26/2022 at 10:00 AM in Ft. Myers Courtroom 4 E before Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. Parties shall file a Case Management Report by 4/11/2022. (WRW)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #3 by C.J. Scerbo. (Haskins, Mark) Modified on 3/3/2022 (jmc).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (jmc)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/22/2022. (jmc)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William S. Shaw and filed in State Court on 1/12/2022.(jmc) Modified on 2/22/2022 (jmc).
|
|
Filing 2
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:22-cv-0105-JES-NPM. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-19242843 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haskins, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
