Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 174.63.129.152 and John Doe |
| 2:2022cv00406 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
JUDGMENT (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SPB)
|
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #13). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal is effective upon filing and requires no further action by the Court. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, in compliance with Rule 41(a), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny all pending motions as moot, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/22/2022. (LAF)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Wang, Yetian)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Motion Motion for Leave to File a Third-Party Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 7/31/2022. (Dudek, Kyle)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Motion for Leave for Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Walker, Rachel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek.
|
|
Filing 10
Copyright Report sent to Washington. (SPB)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Yetian Wang on behalf of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Lead Counsel: Tyler A. Mamone. (Wang, Yetian)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPB)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/11/2022. (SPB) (SPB).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Yetian Wang on behalf of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Wang, Yetian)
|
|
Filing 5
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and U.S. Magistrate Judge Kyle C Dudek. New case number: 2:22-cv-406-SPC-KCD. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal regarding a copyright by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Walker, Rachel) Modified on 7/11/2022, to add docket text. (SPB).
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Walker, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Related case(s): No (Walker, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against John Doe with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19743730) filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Walker, Rachel) Modified on 7/11/2022, to edit docket text. (SPB).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
