Hare v. Ranjie et al
William Frederick Hare |
Ranjie and John and Jane Does 1-20 |
2:2022cv00413 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Nicholas P Mizell |
John E Steele |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by William Frederick Hare. (Webb, John) |
Filing 6 Copyright Report sent to Washington. (JK) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Ranjie. (JK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel John C. Webb of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JK) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/12/2022. (JK) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John E. Steele and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:22-cv-0413-JES-NPM. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement against all Defendants (Filing Fee $402, Receipt #AFLMDC-19754717) filed by William Frederick Hare. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet #6 Proposed Summons for Service of Process - Ranjie )(Webb, John) Modified on 7/8/2022 to correct docket text (SJB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.