Lutz v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Marlo Marie Lutz |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 2:2022cv00432 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Kyle C Dudek |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 7/25/2022. (WRW)
|
| Filing 5 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/21/2022. (SPB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. #43. (SPB) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:22-cv-0432-JLB-KCD. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Marlo Marie Lutz identifying Other Affiliate Bill B. Berke, Other Affiliate David F Chermol, Other Affiliate Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IV, Other Affiliate United States Attorney's Office, Middle District of Florida, Other Affiliate Attorney General of USA for Marlo Marie Lutz.. (Berke, Bill) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19784957) filed by Marlo Marie Lutz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berke, Bill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
