Bowden v. Frost et al
| Christopher J Bowden |
| M. Frost, E. Ramos, A. Cassner and Larson |
| 2:2022cv00769 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Civil Action Order by Christopher J Bowden. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Christopher J Bowden. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO Court of Fee Paid and Duplicate Case filing by Christopher J Bowden (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/6/2022. (JK)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/6/2022. (JK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against A. Cassner, M. Frost, Larson, E. Ramos with Jury Demand Filing fee $402, receipt number 16065 filed by Christopher J Bowden. Zero (0) service copies provided. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
