Rivas v. Conyers et al
Yoandry Primelle Rivas |
A. Nelson, Jessica L. Conyers, Gerry Perez, Andrew Nelson, Andy Nelson, Micheal Rowan, Bonnie Weaver, Hendry County Sheriff's Office, Julio Perez and Sergio Bustamante |
2:2022cv00789 |
December 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's Application for Determination of Civil Indigent Status (Doc. #2) because Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 1/20/2023. (NMC) |
FEES Paid by Yoandry Primelle Rivas (Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 16130). (JK) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/13/2022. (JK) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order for Confined Plaintiff Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/13/2022. (JK) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Yoandry Primelle Rivas. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Yoandry Primelle Rivas. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.