Myers v. Dixon et al
Jay Alan Myers |
Ricky D. Dixon and Centurion Healthcare |
2:2023cv00001 |
January 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Kyle C Dudek |
John E Steele |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2) in light of the Court's dismissal of this action. (See Docs. #4 and #5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 1/19/2023. (NMC) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/18/2023. (RKR) |
Filing 4 ORDER dismissing #1 Complaint filed by Jay Alan Myers for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice to filing an Amended Complaint within 7 days of this Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/5/2023. (RKR) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 1/4/2023. (SEH) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jay Alan Myers. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SEH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Jay Alan Myers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SEH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.