Klarner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kerrie Lynn Klarner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2023cv00025
Filed: January 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 defendant's unopposed motion for more time. By April 12, 2023, defendant must respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 3/9/2023. (JMM)
March 8, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint until April 12, 2023 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell.
January 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 1/20/2023. (WRW)
January 13, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kerrie Lynn Klarner. Related case(s): No (Avard, Carol)
January 12, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Social Security Case Notice by Kerrie Lynn Klarner. (Avard, Carol)
January 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE: Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) became effective on December 1, 2022. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules also apply to this proceeding except to the extent they are inconsistent with the supplemental rules. The Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases entered on December 7, 2021, no longer applies. The parties must review the supplemental rules to determine the governing deadlines, including the deadline to file the plaintiff's brief, the Commissioner's brief, and the plaintiff's reply brief. (JK)
January 12, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:23-cv-0025-SPC-NPM. (SJB)
January 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20392859) filed by Kerrie Lynn Klarner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klarner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerrie Lynn Klarner
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Represented By: Mark V. Zakhvatayev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Nadine DeLuca Elder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?