Johnson-Miller v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mary Johnson-Miller
Defendant: Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00044
Filed: January 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referring Judge: Nicholas P Mizell
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2023 Filing 7 JUDGMENT (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (JK)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. #5). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal is effective upon filing and requires no further action by the Court. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, in compliance with Rule 41(a), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny all pending motions as moot, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/1/2023. (LAH)
February 28, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Mary Johnson-Miller (Hormozdi, Shireen)
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER. Before the Court is the Notice of Settlement. (Doc. #3). As the parties have settled this action, the Court will administratively close the file and dismiss this action without prejudice. See M.D. Fla. R. 3.09(b). Accordingly, it is ORDERED this action is DISMISSED without prejudice subject to the right of a party to move to reopen the case for entry of a stipulated final order or a judgment or for further proceedings on or before March 2, 2023. See Local Rule 3.09(b). If no party files an appropriate paper by that deadline, then the Clerk is DIRECTED to dismiss the action with prejudice and enter judgment without further order. The Clerk is now DIRECTED to deny all pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and administratively close the case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/31/2023. (LAH)
January 30, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of settlement by Mary Johnson-Miller (Hormozdi, Shireen)
January 20, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:23-cv-0044-SPC-NPM. (SJB)
January 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pinnacle Recovery, Inc. (Filing fee $402) filed by Mary Johnson-Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Agruss, Michael) Modified on 1/23/2023 re: notify counsel (SEH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson-Miller v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Johnson-Miller
Represented By: Michael S. Agruss
Represented By: Shireen Hormozdi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?